Environmental Laws, Regulations, & Policies - Federal Level

  • FindLaw Internet Legal Resources (a GREAT environmental law resource)
  • Thomas of the Library of Congress. an excellent resource for keeping in tune with recent legislative actions, tracking the history of bills before Congress as well as legislation enacted into law.
  • Federal Register

  • GPO Access on the Web
  • GPO's Federal Register Access Site
  • GPO's Federal Register Access Site
  • GPO's Federal Register Access Site (Mirrored at University of California)
  • Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)

  • Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
  • Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) - Second Link
  • Searchable Code of Federal Regulations
  • Searchable Code of Federal Regulations (updated through 1992)
  • Searchable Code of Federal Regulations 1995 Title 40 only, provided by the Chemical Industry
  • Code of Federal Regulations - Title 40 only from EPA in Acrobat PDF format, downloadable by Section
  • The U.S. House of Representatives - Internet Law Library - U.S.
  • U.S. Congressional Websites
  • U.S. House of Representatives - CFRs
  • LEFLAW'S TOP 40 INTERNET LAW SITES
  • Legal Information Institute's Environmental Law Materials (Cornell University)
  • Environmental Law World Wide Web Site
  • Federal Government Resources on the Web
  • FedWebLoc - Independent Agencies
  • Government Resources on the Web
  • EnviroText online library, consisting primarily of environment, safety, and health requirements
  • Environmental References for the Practicing Attorney
  • United States Code (U.S.C)

  • United States Code
  • Statutes, Codes, Rules, and Regulations
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

    U.S. Army Corps of Engineers - Policy Guidance

    DOD Instructions & Directives

  • DOD Instructions & Directives
  • Environmental Law Links, maintained by the U.S. Army Environmental Law Division
  • Environmental Law Bookshelf - OSHA Regs, Army Regs, DODD, DODI, International Treaties
  • USACE Civil Works Environmental Desk Reference
  • Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (Pub. L. 101-510)
  • 41 CFR Part 101-47: Federal Property Management Regulations
  • 60 FR 35706: Final Rule for Public Benefit Conveyances of Port Facilities
  • Base Closure Community Assistance Act (Pub. L. 103-160, Title XXIX, Subtitle A)
  • Restoration Advisory Board Implementation Guidelines
  • DOD Base Reuse Implementation Manual (DoD 4165.66-M)
  • Selected DODI/DODD/Policies of Interest

    Selected Environmental Laws

    General

    Cultural and Historic Resources

    Natural Resources

    Water Resources

    Air Quality

    Solid and Hazardous Wastes

    Executive Orders

    Supreme Court Decisions and Other Precendent-setting Legislation

    • Manuel Lujan, Jr. Secretary of the Interior v. Defenders of Wildlife et al. 504 U.S. 555 (1992) regarding a challenge to the attempt of the Secretary of the Interior and Commerce to first promulgate a joint regulation extending 7(a)(2)'s coverage to actions taken in foreign nations, and then to reduce that scope to the U.S. and the high seas.
    • Bruce Babbitt v. Sweet Home Chapter of Communities for a Greater Oregon (1995) involving clarification of "take" under the ESA to not include loss of habitat unless it "proximately" causes death or injury to a listed species
    • Clean Water Act Section 404, Project Purpose must be Water Dependent (40 CFR 230.1-(a)(2))
      • Old Cutler Bay Associates
      • Hartz Mountain
      • Plantation Landing Resort
    • Sierra Club v. Martin, 1997  (also here) In SIERRA CLUB, The Wilderness Society, Georgia Forestwatch, Inc., The Armuchee Alliance, Rabun County Coalition to Save the Forest, Inc., Friends of Georgia, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. George G. MARTIN, in his official capacity as Forest Supervisor of the Chattahoochee and Oconee National Forests, Robert C. Joslin, Regional Forester of the United States Forest Service for Region Eight,  United States Forest Service, Bert Thomas, Cook Brothers Lumber Company, Parton Lumber Co., Inc., Thrift Brothers Lumber Co., Inc., Defendants-Appellants., April 29, 1997   Held the the Migratory Bird Treaty Act does not apply to the federal government because the MBTA's prohibition against "taking" any migratory bird applies only to "any person, association, partnership, or corporation." 16 U.S.C. § 707(a) (1996).
    • Louisiana Wildlife Federation, Inc. v. York et al. (1984/85)
    • Plantation Landing or Gardens
    • Friends of the Earth v. Hintz (9th Circuit case) (1986)
    • Sylvester v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (9th Circuit case) (1989)
    • Shoreline Associates v. Marsh
    • Sierra Club v. Marsh (1988/89)
    • Andrus v. Sierra Club, 442 U.S. 347 (1979) held that Section 102 (2) (C) does NOT require federal agencies to prepare EIS's to accompany appropriation requests, following an allegation that proposed curtailments in the budget of the National Wildlife Refuge System would significantly affect the quality of the human environment, and hence should have been accompanied by an EIS prepared both by the Department of the Interior's Fish and Wildlife Service, which administers the Refuge System, and by OMB
    • Kleppe v. Sierra Club, 427 U.S. 390 (1976), affirming that region-wide EIS's are not required absent an existing proposal for a region-wide action
    • Japan Whaling Assn. v. American Cetacean Society, 478 U.S. 221 (1986) held that the Secretary's decision to secure the certainty of Japan's future compliance with the IWC's program through the 1984 executive agreement, rather than rely on the possibility that certification and imposition of economic sanctions would produce the same or better result, is a reasonable construction of the Pelly and Packwood Amendments
    • Robertson, Chief of the Forest Service, et al. v. Methow Valley Citizens Council et al. held that NEPA does NOT impose a requirement to fully develop and adopt a specific mitigation plan at the EIS stage, that a "worst-case" analysis is NOT required
    • Marsh, Secretary of the Army, et al. v. Oregon Natural Resources Council et al. 490 U.S. 360 (1989) held that agencies must apply a "rule of reason" and prepare supplemental NEPA documentation if there remains a Federal Action at the time new information is brought forward. The court also ruled that deference to the Corps' expertise was appropriate, given the high degree of technical expertise required to evaluate the issues. When specialists disagree, an agency has wide discretion to rely on the reasonable opinions of its own qualified experts, even if others might find contrary views more persuasive.

    Miscellaneous Federal Statutes

    .
    .
    Comments, suggestions and constructive criticisms are always welcome. If you know of a U.S. Federal environmental law-related site that you think others should be aware of, please send us the URL and we'll review it. If it fits with the intent of this page, we'll immediately add it to our page. Likewise, if you note any errors or lost links, let us know that too, and we'll either fix or delete them as well.
    Folding EnvelopeYou can reach the Physalia Ocean Sciences' WebMaster at: webmaster@PhysaliaOS.com
    This page is maintained using Netscape Composer (Navigator 4.7)